Learn / Standards
A library counter, a parking dispute and a home visit each need their own rehearsal, built around the job.
The moment
A resident disputes a rates notice at the counter. A driver argues with a parking officer. A compliance officer knocks on a door alone. Each worker needs to communicate, recognise escalation, and know when to withdraw and get help.
The rules
Australia, Great Britain and the United States each treat aggression at work as a safety-system question before a skills one.
Safe Work Australia’s violence and aggression guide covers the physical environment, systems of work and incident response. Councils apply it with their state or territory requirements. See occupational violence duties and psychosocial hazards.
HSE lone working guidance says working alone can leave staff more vulnerable, and names training to recognise risk and use conflict resolution techniques or leave. Practise both choices with the council’s real check-in and emergency arrangements.
OSHA’s State Plan guidance explains that state and local government workers are covered in states with an OSHA-approved State Plan, not by federal OSHA. Establish the state framework first. See US workplace violence rules.
The scenarios
Each one is built from the council’s own procedure and the support staff can call on.
A resident disputes a service decision. The worker explains what can be reviewed, holds a clear boundary without promising an outcome, and knows when a supervisor should join. The route to help matches the building and the staffing.
A person disputes an officer’s authority. The officer explains the process, recognises escalation, and follows the support or withdrawal pathway. The scenario never invents powers or rewards unsafe persistence.
Pre-visit information, check-in arrangements, access to help and when to stop. Give the learner a changed condition to notice. The debrief covers the system too: a missing contact or a blocked exit is not solved by better words.
Record observed communication, recognition of risk, use of support and the local procedure. Reassess in a comparable situation. The pilot evaluation guide sets the measures.
The evidence
This is research by others, not PTR’s own results.
PTR has no published de-escalation result of its own yet. The published studies report confidence and simulated-skill gains, each with design limits worth reading before a pilot.
How it runs
Staff practise in a VR headset or with an AI roleplay partner in a browser, then debrief.
Questions
Short answers.
No. The risk assessment picks the scenarios and names the controls each exercise depends on. Review both after incidents or changes in work.
No. Include the approved conditions for stopping, withdrawing and getting help, and check staff recognise them.
Use approved, de-identified material limited to the learning need. A composite scenario reproduces the decision without identifying anyone.
Role fit, subject-matter review, accessibility, facilitation, assessment criteria and record handling. See how provider types compare.
Training council frontline staff?
Each rule in full, on the regulator’s own site.

The physical environment, systems of work and incident response.

Training to recognise risk, use conflict resolution or leave.

Coverage of state and local government workers under State Plans.
Learn / Standards
A library counter, a parking dispute and a home visit each need their own rehearsal, built around the job.
The moment
A resident disputes a rates notice at the counter. A driver argues with a parking officer. A compliance officer knocks on a door alone. Each worker needs to communicate, recognise escalation, and know when to withdraw and get help.
The rules
Australia, Great Britain and the United States each treat aggression at work as a safety-system question before a skills one.
Safe Work Australia’s violence and aggression guide covers the physical environment, systems of work and incident response. Councils apply it with their state or territory requirements. See occupational violence duties and psychosocial hazards.
HSE lone working guidance says working alone can leave staff more vulnerable, and names training to recognise risk and use conflict resolution techniques or leave. Practise both choices with the council’s real check-in and emergency arrangements.
OSHA’s State Plan guidance explains that state and local government workers are covered in states with an OSHA-approved State Plan, not by federal OSHA. Establish the state framework first. See US workplace violence rules.
The scenarios
Each one is built from the council’s own procedure and the support staff can call on.
A resident disputes a service decision. The worker explains what can be reviewed, holds a clear boundary without promising an outcome, and knows when a supervisor should join. The route to help matches the building and the staffing.
A person disputes an officer’s authority. The officer explains the process, recognises escalation, and follows the support or withdrawal pathway. The scenario never invents powers or rewards unsafe persistence.
Pre-visit information, check-in arrangements, access to help and when to stop. Give the learner a changed condition to notice. The debrief covers the system too: a missing contact or a blocked exit is not solved by better words.
Record observed communication, recognition of risk, use of support and the local procedure. Reassess in a comparable situation. The pilot evaluation guide sets the measures.
The evidence
This is research by others, not PTR’s own results.
PTR has no published de-escalation result of its own yet. The published studies report confidence and simulated-skill gains, each with design limits worth reading before a pilot.
How it runs
Staff practise in a VR headset or with an AI roleplay partner in a browser, then debrief.
Questions
Short answers.
No. The risk assessment picks the scenarios and names the controls each exercise depends on. Review both after incidents or changes in work.
No. Include the approved conditions for stopping, withdrawing and getting help, and check staff recognise them.
Use approved, de-identified material limited to the learning need. A composite scenario reproduces the decision without identifying anyone.
Role fit, subject-matter review, accessibility, facilitation, assessment criteria and record handling. See how provider types compare.
Training council frontline staff?
Each rule in full, on the regulator’s own site.

The physical environment, systems of work and incident response.

Training to recognise risk, use conflict resolution or leave.

Coverage of state and local government workers under State Plans.