Training programs / For clinical educators & simulation leads
The standards wording, who runs the debrief, and how a scenario grows from an incident report.
Your questions
The regulator names processes and competence, then asks who practised.
Action 1.20 asks a health service to “Implement a mandatory training program” and to “Monitor the workforce’s participation in training”. Action 5.34 asks for processes to “Implement de-escalation strategies”. The assessor’s question under Action 5.36: “How does the health service organisation ensure that the workforce is competent in implementing de-escalation strategies?”
Action 5.33 asks for processes “to identify and mitigate situations that may precipitate aggression”; Action 5.35, to “Ensure that members of the workforce who implement restraint are trained to do so safely”. A scenario written from a real trigger, then debriefed, is a process an assessor can see. Restrictive practices training requirements.
For accredited home care, the Joint Commission’s R3 Report Issue 45 asks for “Training in de-escalation, nonphysical intervention skills, physical intervention techniques, and response to emergency incidents”, “at time of hire, annually, and whenever changes occur regarding the workplace violence prevention program”; similar hospital requirements took effect in 2022 (the hospital requirement). OSHA 3148: “Effective training programs should involve role-playing, simulations and drills.”
Your questions
Your own educators can, once they are prepared to debrief. Running the headset is a separate skill.
The INACSL Debriefing Process standard: “All simulation-based educational (SBE) activities must include a planned debriefing process.” Its Criterion 2 asks for a facilitator “capable and/or competent in providing appropriate feedback, debriefing, and/or guided reflection”. Mater Education’s facilitators were trained to run the technology; debriefing capability needs its own preparation, in the format you choose.
INACSL: “Prebriefing ensures that simulation learners are prepared for the educational content and are aware of the ground rules for the simulation-based experience.”
Your questions
Standalone headsets, a browser, or a hologram in the lab you already run.
Mixed reality places a patient or family member in your real room, beside the procedural station; VR Library titles run on standalone headsets in a workshop your facilitator leads. For US prelicensure nursing programs, the NCSBN National Simulation Study, which measured simulation in general, found “up to 50% simulation can be effectively substituted for traditional clinical experience in all prelicensure core nursing courses under conditions comparable to those described in the study”. Australian and New Zealand rules: university simulation centres.
Steps to take with an incident report, before PTR is involved. Designing a scenario and debrief.
Where practice fits




How it runs




PTR’s published work
Conversation programs, each labelled by who measured it. Neither is a measured de-escalation or restraint outcome in a hospital.
Mater Education ran its speaking-up program in VR across its regional and Brisbane campuses, with more than 60 participants. In Mater’s own program evaluation, over 96% of participants wanted more training in VR. Mater measured it. The pilot report and the case study.
People Tech Revolution built a DEI module for nurse leaders at Mayo Clinic; Mayo’s researchers evaluated it in the Journal of Nursing Administration. It ran over 4 months, 593 of 1,131 learners returned the evaluation, and they rated the debriefing sessions as effective. Mayo measured it. The case study and the research summary.
Planning a program for your simulation centre?
Each standard at its source.

Mandatory training and monitoring.

Triggers, de-escalation and restraint.

A planned debrief in every simulation.

Prebriefing, facilitation and debriefing.

US prelicensure simulation, under the study’s conditions.

Training content and cadence for home care.

Role-playing, simulations and drills.
Training programs / For clinical educators & simulation leads
The standards wording, who runs the debrief, and how a scenario grows from an incident report.
Your questions
The regulator names processes and competence, then asks who practised.
Action 1.20 asks a health service to “Implement a mandatory training program” and to “Monitor the workforce’s participation in training”. Action 5.34 asks for processes to “Implement de-escalation strategies”. The assessor’s question under Action 5.36: “How does the health service organisation ensure that the workforce is competent in implementing de-escalation strategies?”
Action 5.33 asks for processes “to identify and mitigate situations that may precipitate aggression”; Action 5.35, to “Ensure that members of the workforce who implement restraint are trained to do so safely”. A scenario written from a real trigger, then debriefed, is a process an assessor can see. Restrictive practices training requirements.
For accredited home care, the Joint Commission’s R3 Report Issue 45 asks for “Training in de-escalation, nonphysical intervention skills, physical intervention techniques, and response to emergency incidents”, “at time of hire, annually, and whenever changes occur regarding the workplace violence prevention program”; similar hospital requirements took effect in 2022 (the hospital requirement). OSHA 3148: “Effective training programs should involve role-playing, simulations and drills.”
Your questions
Your own educators can, once they are prepared to debrief. Running the headset is a separate skill.
The INACSL Debriefing Process standard: “All simulation-based educational (SBE) activities must include a planned debriefing process.” Its Criterion 2 asks for a facilitator “capable and/or competent in providing appropriate feedback, debriefing, and/or guided reflection”. Mater Education’s facilitators were trained to run the technology; debriefing capability needs its own preparation, in the format you choose.
INACSL: “Prebriefing ensures that simulation learners are prepared for the educational content and are aware of the ground rules for the simulation-based experience.”
Your questions
Standalone headsets, a browser, or a hologram in the lab you already run.
Mixed reality places a patient or family member in your real room, beside the procedural station; VR Library titles run on standalone headsets in a workshop your facilitator leads. For US prelicensure nursing programs, the NCSBN National Simulation Study, which measured simulation in general, found “up to 50% simulation can be effectively substituted for traditional clinical experience in all prelicensure core nursing courses under conditions comparable to those described in the study”. Australian and New Zealand rules: university simulation centres.
Steps to take with an incident report, before PTR is involved. Designing a scenario and debrief.
Where practice fits
How it runs
PTR’s published work
Conversation programs, each labelled by who measured it. Neither is a measured de-escalation or restraint outcome in a hospital.
Mater Education ran its speaking-up program in VR across its regional and Brisbane campuses, with more than 60 participants. In Mater’s own program evaluation, over 96% of participants wanted more training in VR. Mater measured it. The pilot report and the case study.
People Tech Revolution built a DEI module for nurse leaders at Mayo Clinic; Mayo’s researchers evaluated it in the Journal of Nursing Administration. It ran over 4 months, 593 of 1,131 learners returned the evaluation, and they rated the debriefing sessions as effective. Mayo measured it. The case study and the research summary.
Planning a program for your simulation centre?
Each standard at its source.

Mandatory training and monitoring.

Triggers, de-escalation and restraint.

A planned debrief in every simulation.

Prebriefing, facilitation and debriefing.

US prelicensure simulation, under the study’s conditions.

Training content and cadence for home care.

Role-playing, simulations and drills.