Learn / Standards
Every state and territory asks employers to manage the risk of violence and aggression at work.
The hazard
A man on the footpath outside a call-out. A resident who lashes out during care. A client at the door who will not leave. Occupational violence and aggression, or OVA, is a hazard every employer here must manage.
The duty
Work health and safety law asks employers to remove the risk where they can and reduce it where they cannot.
Under the Work Health and Safety Regulation, a business must manage psychosocial risks and put controls in place to eliminate them so far as is reasonably practicable, or minimise them where it is not.
Queensland’s regulation lists what an employer must weigh when choosing controls, including workplace interactions or behaviours and the information, training, instruction and supervision given to workers. See psychosocial hazards training.
An inspector may refer to an approved code of practice when issuing an improvement or prohibition notice, and courts may rely on one to decide what is reasonably practicable.
The NSW healthcare code places training among administrative controls and calls them the least effective, because they rely on human behaviour or supervision. Training earns its place by changing what people do, and showing it.
State by state
Short entries, each linked to the rule itself.
The Healthcare and social assistance industry Code of Practice asks for training in early warning signs of violent behaviour, de-escalation techniques, personal safety, and care needs such as dementia and mental health conditions.
The Occupational Health and Safety (Psychological Health) Regulations name aggression or violence as an example. The Department of Health’s OVA training modules cover risk assessment, de-escalation, Code Grey and Code Black roles, and incident reporting, with a framework for evaluating the training.
The Work Health and Safety Regulation requires a business to manage psychosocial risks, weighing workplace interactions and the training workers receive.
The Work Health and Safety (General) Regulations require a business to manage psychosocial risks and put control measures in place.
The Work Health and Safety Regulation requires controls that eliminate psychosocial risks so far as is reasonably practicable, or minimise them.
The Work Health and Safety (National Uniform Legislation) Regulations set the same duty to eliminate or minimise psychosocial risks.
Read the South Australian Work Health and Safety Regulations and the Tasmanian Work Health and Safety Regulations on each state’s legislation site.
The NSQHS Standards add accreditation duties: Action 1.20 asks for a mandatory training program and Action 5.34 for de-escalation strategies.
Where practice fits
Codes rank training low because it relies on behaviour. Rehearsal is how behaviour changes, and the record is how you show it.
Staff practise the conversation with a simulated person who responds to what they say, in OVA training built for hospitals, aged care and disability support. A debrief follows each attempt, and the record shows who practised what.
Compared with the United States
American rules often name the method itself.
California and Nevada write practice with colleagues and a debrief into their health care rules, while Australian codes name the topics and rank the controls. Both lead to rehearsal with a record. See workplace violence training rules in the United States.
Questions
Short answers to the questions that follow the rules.
The regulations require employers to manage the risk, and the controls they weigh include the training workers receive. Codes such as the NSW healthcare code name the topics.
Those of each state and territory where you have workers, so a national provider meets several versions of the same duty.
Work health and safety duties sit with the regulator, and NSQHS actions sit with the accreditation surveyor. One program can serve both when it produces evidence.
Who practised, which scenario, and what changed. Training records sets out what to keep, and NSQHS training for Directors of Clinical Services covers the hospital view.
Managing occupational violence in Australia?
Each rule in full, on the legislator’s or regulator’s own site.

Training topics, the hierarchy of controls, and how an approved code is used.

Names aggression or violence among the psychosocial hazards.

The training guide and eLearning modules for Victorian health services.

The duty to manage psychosocial risks and the matters to weigh.

Controls that eliminate or minimise psychosocial risks.

The same duty to manage psychosocial risks.

The duty to manage psychosocial risks and apply control measures.

The action on identifying aggression risk and implementing de-escalation strategies.
Learn / Standards
Every state and territory asks employers to manage the risk of violence and aggression at work.
The hazard
A man on the footpath outside a call-out. A resident who lashes out during care. A client at the door who will not leave. Occupational violence and aggression, or OVA, is a hazard every employer here must manage.
The duty
Work health and safety law asks employers to remove the risk where they can and reduce it where they cannot.
Under the Work Health and Safety Regulation, a business must manage psychosocial risks and put controls in place to eliminate them so far as is reasonably practicable, or minimise them where it is not.
Queensland’s regulation lists what an employer must weigh when choosing controls, including workplace interactions or behaviours and the information, training, instruction and supervision given to workers. See psychosocial hazards training.
An inspector may refer to an approved code of practice when issuing an improvement or prohibition notice, and courts may rely on one to decide what is reasonably practicable.
The NSW healthcare code places training among administrative controls and calls them the least effective, because they rely on human behaviour or supervision. Training earns its place by changing what people do, and showing it.
State by state
Short entries, each linked to the rule itself.
The Healthcare and social assistance industry Code of Practice asks for training in early warning signs of violent behaviour, de-escalation techniques, personal safety, and care needs such as dementia and mental health conditions.
The Occupational Health and Safety (Psychological Health) Regulations name aggression or violence as an example. The Department of Health’s OVA training modules cover risk assessment, de-escalation, Code Grey and Code Black roles, and incident reporting, with a framework for evaluating the training.
The Work Health and Safety Regulation requires a business to manage psychosocial risks, weighing workplace interactions and the training workers receive.
The Work Health and Safety (General) Regulations require a business to manage psychosocial risks and put control measures in place.
The Work Health and Safety Regulation requires controls that eliminate psychosocial risks so far as is reasonably practicable, or minimise them.
The Work Health and Safety (National Uniform Legislation) Regulations set the same duty to eliminate or minimise psychosocial risks.
Read the South Australian Work Health and Safety Regulations and the Tasmanian Work Health and Safety Regulations on each state’s legislation site.
The NSQHS Standards add accreditation duties: Action 1.20 asks for a mandatory training program and Action 5.34 for de-escalation strategies.
Where practice fits
Codes rank training low because it relies on behaviour. Rehearsal is how behaviour changes, and the record is how you show it.
Staff practise the conversation with a simulated person who responds to what they say, in OVA training built for hospitals, aged care and disability support. A debrief follows each attempt, and the record shows who practised what.
Compared with the United States
American rules often name the method itself.
California and Nevada write practice with colleagues and a debrief into their health care rules, while Australian codes name the topics and rank the controls. Both lead to rehearsal with a record. See workplace violence training rules in the United States.
Questions
Short answers to the questions that follow the rules.
The regulations require employers to manage the risk, and the controls they weigh include the training workers receive. Codes such as the NSW healthcare code name the topics.
Those of each state and territory where you have workers, so a national provider meets several versions of the same duty.
Work health and safety duties sit with the regulator, and NSQHS actions sit with the accreditation surveyor. One program can serve both when it produces evidence.
Who practised, which scenario, and what changed. Training records sets out what to keep, and NSQHS training for Directors of Clinical Services covers the hospital view.
Managing occupational violence in Australia?
Each rule in full, on the legislator’s or regulator’s own site.

Training topics, the hierarchy of controls, and how an approved code is used.

Names aggression or violence among the psychosocial hazards.

The training guide and eLearning modules for Victorian health services.

The duty to manage psychosocial risks and the matters to weigh.

Controls that eliminate or minimise psychosocial risks.

The same duty to manage psychosocial risks.

The duty to manage psychosocial risks and apply control measures.

The action on identifying aggression risk and implementing de-escalation strategies.