Learn / Standards

NSQHS Action 1.20, explained for the people who have to meet it

Every hospital in Australia is assessed against the same set of national standards. One line in them decides what a mandatory training program has to look like, and this page is about that line.

What the standards are

The rulebook every Australian hospital is assessed against

The National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards are set by the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, and a hospital keeps its accreditation by meeting every one of them.

Inside the simulation, a resuscitation bay is seen from the foot of an empty bed, equipment trolleys nearby, three clinicians waiting on the wearer's call. — A resus bay, waiting on the wearer's call.

Many standards, one assessor

An assessment lands with short notice, and a team walks the wards with the standards in hand. They range from clinical governance to communicating for safety, and each one is broken into numbered actions a hospital must show it meets.

The first standard, Clinical Governance, is the one that covers how a hospital trains its own workforce. Action 1.20 sits inside it, and it is the line a Director of Clinical Services reads when the training program is being planned.

What Action 1.20 says

In the Commission's own words

Quoted from the Clinical Governance Standard on the Commission's own site, and linked below.

A nurse in scrubs and a grey cardigan stands in a dim hospital corridor beside a column of glowing message panels, a linen trolley further down the hall. — A nurse works through it in the corridor.

What a training system must do

Action 1.20 states that the health service organisation uses its training systems to assess the competency and training needs of its workforce, implement a mandatory training program to meet its requirements arising from these standards, provide access to training to meet its safety and quality training needs, and monitor the workforce's participation in training.

Two of those four are about the program itself. The other two are about knowing who needs what, and knowing who actually took part. That second pair is where a training register earns its keep.

A simulated hospital corridor seen through the headset, two nurses ahead and a floating panel of replies at the right. — The ward session an assessor asks about.

What it means in practice

Two columns that have to agree

A training register is only evidence if it answers the assessor's two questions in one place.

Who sat the session, and what the session asked them to do. When practice is a scenario staff actually run rather than a module they click through, both columns come from the same record, and the mandatory program stops being a list of completions and starts being something an assessor can inspect.

That is the shape PTR builds to. The practice sits inside the mandatory program a hospital already runs, the cohort is recorded as it goes, and the evaluation is reported in the hospital's own name, which is how it happened at Mater Education and what the healthcare page is built around.

For Directors of Clinical Services Action 5.34, on aggression Speaking up for safety training

What people ask about this action

The questions that follow a first reading of it.

What counts as a mandatory training program?

Action 1.20 asks a health service to use its training systems to assess the competency and training needs of its workforce, implement a mandatory training program to meet its requirements arising from these standards, provide access to training, and monitor the workforce's participation in training. Two of those four are about the program. The other two are about knowing who needs what, and knowing who turned up.

Where does a graduate nurse program fit?

Inside the same answer. Practice is built to sit in a program a hospital already runs rather than to arrive as one more thing on the calendar, so a graduate nurse cohort, a ward refresher and the annual mandatory day all leave the same kind of record and land in the same register.

Is a list of completions enough?

It answers one of the assessor's two questions. A completion says somebody attended; it does not say what the session asked them to do. When the practice is a scenario staff actually run, both columns come out of the same record and the program becomes something an assessor can inspect.

Who owns this inside a hospital?

The line names no role. In practice it is read by the Director of Clinical Services planning the training year and delivered by the clinical educators who run the sessions, and Action 5.34 decides what part of that program has to be about aggression.

Preparing for NSQHS assessment?

Open the contact form

Source

The standard this page quotes, on the Commission's own site.

Three clinicians in scrubs stand around an empty resuscitation trolley, monitors and equipment trolleys on either side of the bay.

Clinical Governance Standard, Action 1.20

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards

The health service organisation uses its training systems to assess the competency and training needs of its workforce, implement a mandatory training program to meet its requirements arising from these standards, provide access to training to meet its safety and quality training needs, and monitor the workforce's participation in training.