Learn / Standards
A written plan, annual training and a person to answer questions. Health care adds de-escalation practice with colleagues.
The moment
SB 553 reaches almost every California employer outside health care. It is written for the customer who turns on a retail worker, the visitor at reception, and the member of the public at a service counter.
What it asks
Labor Code section 6401.9 requires a workplace violence prevention plan, and training when the plan is first established and annually after that.
Training material suits the education, literacy and language of the staff. Additional training follows a new or previously unrecognised hazard, or a change to the plan.
The plan and how to get a copy. How to report incidents or concerns without fear of reprisal. The hazards of each job, the corrective measures in place, how to seek help, and strategies to avoid physical harm. The violent incident log.
Training includes an opportunity for interactive questions and answers with a person knowledgeable about the plan.
The health care rule
SB 553 never uses the word. The state’s health care rule does, and it asks for practice.
The health care rule names verbal intervention and de-escalation techniques for staff who confront or control aggressive people. It adds an opportunity to practise with the colleagues they work with, including a meeting to debrief the session.
Health care operations covered by the health care rule are excluded from SB 553. A retailer, warehouse or office works to SB 553; a hospital, home health service or drug treatment program works to the health care rule.
Training records are kept for at least one year, and hazard records for at least five. See workplace violence training records.
Where practice fits
SB 553 asks staff to know how to seek help and avoid physical harm. VR de-escalation training and AI roleplay practice turn that into something they have done.
Beyond California
SB 553 is one of several US workplace violence training rules, and employers in Australia meet the same moments.
Nevada copied the practice and debrief clause for medical facilities, and New York retail employers train on de-escalation tactics.
Australian employers manage customer aggression as a psychosocial hazard, and Victoria’s regulations name aggression and violence outright. See psychosocial hazards training for managers.
Questions
Short answers to the questions that follow a first reading of the law.
The statute never uses the word. De-escalation appears in the health care rule, which also asks for practice with colleagues and a debrief.
The statute names no format. It does require interactive questions and answers with a person who knows the plan.
At least one year. Hazard records are kept for at least five.
Training staff in California?
Each rule in full, on the regulator’s own site.

The plan, the annual training, the topics and the record retention periods.

Names de-escalation, and practice with colleagues followed by a debrief.

The practice and debrief clause, with a record of each session.

De-escalation tactics, active shooter drills and emergency procedures.

Names aggression and violence among the hazards an employer must control.
Learn / Standards
A written plan, annual training and a person to answer questions. Health care adds de-escalation practice with colleagues.
The moment
SB 553 reaches almost every California employer outside health care. It is written for the customer who turns on a retail worker, the visitor at reception, and the member of the public at a service counter.
What it asks
Labor Code section 6401.9 requires a workplace violence prevention plan, and training when the plan is first established and annually after that.
Training material suits the education, literacy and language of the staff. Additional training follows a new or previously unrecognised hazard, or a change to the plan.
The plan and how to get a copy. How to report incidents or concerns without fear of reprisal. The hazards of each job, the corrective measures in place, how to seek help, and strategies to avoid physical harm. The violent incident log.
Training includes an opportunity for interactive questions and answers with a person knowledgeable about the plan.
The health care rule
SB 553 never uses the word. The state’s health care rule does, and it asks for practice.
The health care rule names verbal intervention and de-escalation techniques for staff who confront or control aggressive people. It adds an opportunity to practise with the colleagues they work with, including a meeting to debrief the session.
Health care operations covered by the health care rule are excluded from SB 553. A retailer, warehouse or office works to SB 553; a hospital, home health service or drug treatment program works to the health care rule.
Training records are kept for at least one year, and hazard records for at least five. See workplace violence training records.
Where practice fits
SB 553 asks staff to know how to seek help and avoid physical harm. VR de-escalation training and AI roleplay practice turn that into something they have done.
Beyond California
SB 553 is one of several US workplace violence training rules, and employers in Australia meet the same moments.
Nevada copied the practice and debrief clause for medical facilities, and New York retail employers train on de-escalation tactics.
Australian employers manage customer aggression as a psychosocial hazard, and Victoria’s regulations name aggression and violence outright. See psychosocial hazards training for managers.
Questions
Short answers to the questions that follow a first reading of the law.
The statute never uses the word. De-escalation appears in the health care rule, which also asks for practice with colleagues and a debrief.
The statute names no format. It does require interactive questions and answers with a person who knows the plan.
At least one year. Hazard records are kept for at least five.
Training staff in California?
Each rule in full, on the regulator’s own site.

The plan, the annual training, the topics and the record retention periods.

Names de-escalation, and practice with colleagues followed by a debrief.

The practice and debrief clause, with a record of each session.

De-escalation tactics, active shooter drills and emergency procedures.

Names aggression and violence among the hazards an employer must control.